Train Freight Elec¤
title: Introduction¤
Electric Train Freight¤
Overview¤
Electric train freight1 involves the transportation of goods by trains powered by electric locomotives. This mode of transportation leverages the efficiency and environmental benefits of electric power, offering a sustainable and reliable solution for moving large volumes of cargo overland.
Benefits¤
- Environmental Impact: Electric trains produce zero emissions at the point of use, reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions compared to diesel trains.
- Energy Efficiency: Electric locomotives are generally more efficient than diesel engines, converting a higher percentage of energy into useful work.
- Reduced Noise: Electric trains are quieter than diesel-powered trains, reducing noise pollution along rail corridors.
- Operational Cost: Lower operating costs due to reduced fuel consumption and less maintenance compared to diesel engines.
Applications¤
- Bulk Commodities: Transportation of bulk goods such as coal, grain, minerals, and chemicals.
- Container Freight: Movement of intermodal containers, allowing seamless transfer between ships, trucks, and trains.
Challenges¤
- Infrastructure Requirements: Requires extensive and costly electrification infrastructure, including overhead lines or third rails and substations.
- Grid Dependency: Relies on a stable and robust electricity supply, which can be a challenge in areas with unreliable power grids.
- Initial Investment: High initial capital costs for electrification projects and electric locomotives.
ES Model Parameters¤
All the parameters concerning the Train Freight Elec are listed in the table below.
entry_key | value | unit | sets | source_reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
ELECTRICITY_EHV (layer) | -0.0683 | - | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
ELECTRICITY_EHV (layer) | -0.0683 | - | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
MOB_FREIGHT_RAIL (layer) | 1 | - | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
MOB_FREIGHT_RAIL (layer) | 1 | - | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
c_inv | 104.4 | MCHF/(Mtkm/h) | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
c_inv | 104.4 | MCHF/(Mtkm/h) | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
c_maint | 2.6 | MCHF/(Mtkm/h)/y | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
c_maint | 2.6 | MCHF/(Mtkm/h)/y | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
c_p | 1 | - | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
c_p | 1 | - | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
lifetime | 40 | y | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
lifetime | 40 | y | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
ref_size | 38500 | tkm/h | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
ref_size | 38500 | tkm/h | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
trl | 9 | - | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
trl | 9 | - | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
References¤
Data Sources |
---|
Schnidrig, Jonas. (2020). "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
-
Zenith, Federico, Raphael Isaac, Andreas Hoffrichter, Magnus Skinlo Thomassen, et Steffen Møller-Holst. 2020. « Techno-Economic Analysis of Freight Railway Electrification by Overhead Line, Hydrogen and Batteries: Case Studies in Norway and USA ». Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 234( 7): 791‑802. doi:10.1177/0954409719867495 ⧉. ↩