Train Freight Hydrogen¤
Overview¤
Hydrogen Train Freight1 involves the transportation of goods by trains powered by hydrogen fuel cells. This technology utilizes the chemical energy of hydrogen to generate electricity, offering a clean and efficient alternative to traditional diesel-powered freight trains. Hydrogen-powered trains are particularly advantageous for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and reliance on fossil fuels. They provide a flexible and scalable solution, especially beneficial for rail lines with lower traffic volumes where full electrification may not be economically viable.
Process Description¤
- Hydrogen Fuel Cell Operation: Hydrogen fuel cells generate electricity through the chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen, producing only water and heat as byproducts.
- Electric Drive: The electricity generated by the fuel cells is used to power electric motors that drive the train.
- Hydrogen Storage: Hydrogen is stored on board the train in high-pressure tanks, providing the necessary fuel for the journey.
- Refueling: Hydrogen refueling stations are used to refill the train’s hydrogen tanks, similar to refueling conventional fuel tanks. This infrastructure can be more flexible and less costly compared to building extensive overhead electrification.
Benefits¤
- Zero Emissions: Produces no greenhouse gases or air pollutants at the point of use, only water vapor, contributing to cleaner air and reduced environmental impact.
- High Efficiency: Hydrogen fuel cells have higher efficiencies compared to internal combustion engines, particularly in variable load conditions typical for rail transport.
- Energy Density: Hydrogen has a high energy density by weight, allowing for longer range capabilities compared to batteries.
- Reduced Noise: Hydrogen fuel cell trains are quieter than diesel-powered trains, contributing to lower noise pollution along rail corridors.
- Flexibility and Scalability: Suitable for a variety of routes and traffic volumes, offering a practical solution for both low and high-demand lines.
Applications¤
- Long-Distance Freight: Suitable for long-distance freight routes where electrification is not available or feasible. Hydrogen trains can cover longer distances without the need for frequent refueling stops.
- Regional and Commuter Services: Can also be adapted for regional and commuter rail services, enhancing sustainability in passenger transport.
- Remote and Rural Areas: Ideal for areas lacking electrified rail infrastructure, providing a sustainable alternative without the need for extensive electrification investments. This is particularly beneficial for routes with lower traffic volumes where full electrification may not be cost-effective.
Challenges¤
- Hydrogen Infrastructure: Requires the development of hydrogen production, storage, and refueling infrastructure, which can be costly and logistically challenging. However, the flexibility of hydrogen refueling stations can mitigate some of these costs compared to overhead electrification.
- Fuel Cost: The cost of hydrogen, especially green hydrogen produced from renewable sources, can be higher than conventional fuels. However, this cost is expected to decrease with technological advancements and increased production scale.
- Technological Maturity: While hydrogen fuel cell technology is advancing, it is still in the early stages of deployment in the rail sector compared to more established technologies like batteries and overhead electrification.
Future Outlook¤
The future of hydrogen train freight is promising, with increasing investments in hydrogen production and infrastructure. Advances in fuel cell technology, coupled with decreasing costs of hydrogen production, particularly from renewable sources, are expected to enhance the feasibility and adoption of hydrogen-powered trains. As the transportation sector seeks to reduce its carbon footprint, hydrogen train freight offers a viable and sustainable alternative, particularly for non-electrified rail networks and long-distance routes. Additionally, the flexibility and scalability of hydrogen technology make it a strong
| entry_key | value | unit | sets | source_reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2_EHP (layer) | -0.022 | kWh | CAN | Slaymaker, Amara, (2021): "Demographic and Geographic Region Definition in Energy System Modelling. A Case Study of Canada's Path to Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 and the Role of Hydrogen" |
| H2_HP (layer) | -0.333 | - | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| H2_HP (layer) | -0.333 | - | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| MOB_FREIGHT_RAIL (layer) | 1 | - | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| MOB_FREIGHT_RAIL (layer) | 1 | - | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| MOB_FREIGHT_RAIL (layer) | 1 | tkm | CAN | Slaymaker, Amara, (2021): "Demographic and Geographic Region Definition in Energy System Modelling. A Case Study of Canada's Path to Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 and the Role of Hydrogen" |
| c_inv | 49.23 | CAD/(tkm/h) | CAN | Slaymaker, Amara, (2021): "Demographic and Geographic Region Definition in Energy System Modelling. A Case Study of Canada's Path to Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 and the Role of Hydrogen" |
| c_inv | 104.4 | MCHF/(Mtkm/h) | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| c_inv | 104.4 | MCHF/(Mtkm/h) | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| c_maint | 2.6 | MCHF/(Mtkm/h)/y | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| c_maint | 2.6 | MCHF/(Mtkm/h)/y | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| c_maint | 4.47 | CAD/(tkm/h)/y | CAN | Slaymaker, Amara, (2021): "Demographic and Geographic Region Definition in Energy System Modelling. A Case Study of Canada's Path to Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 and the Role of Hydrogen" |
| c_p | 1 | - | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| c_p | 1 | - | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| c_p | 1 | - | CAN | Slaymaker, Amara, (2021): "Demographic and Geographic Region Definition in Energy System Modelling. A Case Study of Canada's Path to Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 and the Role of Hydrogen" |
| lifetime | 40 | y | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| lifetime | 40 | y | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| lifetime | 40 | y | CAN | Slaymaker, Amara, (2021): "Demographic and Geographic Region Definition in Energy System Modelling. A Case Study of Canada's Path to Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 and the Role of Hydrogen" |
| ref_size | 38500 | tkm/h | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| ref_size | 38500 | tkm/h | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| trl | 9 | - | FRA | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| trl | 9 | - | DEU | Schnidrig, Jonas, (2020): "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
References¤
| Data Sources |
|---|
| Schnidrig, Jonas. (2020). "Assessment of Green Mobility Scenarios on European Energy Systems" |
| Slaymaker, Amara. (2021). "Demographic and Geographic Region Definition in Energy System Modelling. A Case Study of Canada's Path to Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 and the Role of Hydrogen" |
-
Zenith, Federico, Raphael Isaac, Andreas Hoffrichter, Magnus Skinlo Thomassen, et Steffen Møller-Holst. 2020. « Techno-Economic Analysis of Freight Railway Electrification by Overhead Line, Hydrogen and Batteries: Case Studies in Norway and USA ». Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 234( 7): 791‑802. doi:10.1177/0954409719867495 ⧉. ↩